Spotlight / Projects

    Whose Experience Counts as Expertise?

    Inside a Climate Curriculum Built by, and for, Senior Artists

    Author

    Artit

    June 2025

    Whose Experience Counts as Expertise?

    What happens when the people who've lived through the most environmental change are the last ones asked to weigh in on it?

     

    Ask most people to picture a "climate expert," and a senior citizen probably isn't who comes to mind. But expertise doesn't only come from data. Sometimes it comes from having watched a coastline, a growing season, or a whole way of life change over the course of a lifetime.

     

    That's the starting point for a new interdisciplinary curriculum developed to take the lived environmental knowledge of senior artists seriously, and give it a structured outlet.

     

    Research Before Curriculum
    The temptation with any educational resource is to adapt something that already exists and hope it fits. This project resisted that. The work began not with content, but with questions: interviews and surveys, run directly with senior participants and the professionals who support them, to find out what was actually missing.

     

    What came back wasn't only "more climate facts." It was a gap in digital confidence, in communication know-how, and in practical routes from artistic intention to public action. The curriculum that followed was shaped in two passes: first the overall architecture, then the fine detail of each module, tested with real participants before anything was finalized. It now exists in five languages: English, Greek, Slovak, Italian, and Spanish.

     

    Six Modules, One Throughline
    Rather than opening with statistics, the curriculum opens with practice, using art as the entry point into environmental thinking, not an afterthought tacked onto it. From there, the modules build outward:

    Module I lays scientific groundwork, but keeps it tethered to problems seniors can act on locally, not just globally.

    Module II is unusually practical for a climate resource: digital skills, treated as a prerequisite for advocacy rather than an optional extra.

    Module III is where the curriculum gets most interesting, asking what eco-art actually requires, ethically and logistically, when it moves beyond gesture into practice.

    Module V builds the communication and networking skills to carry that work further than a single studio or exhibition.

    Module VI ties the previous threads together into something closer to a leadership toolkit than a lesson plan.

     

    Roughly 500 Reasons This Isn't Theoretical
    On paper, this could easily have stayed an academic exercise. In practice, close to 500 senior participants across four countries, some established artists, some entirely new to creative practice, have already worked through it. They're not positioned as an audience absorbing information. They're positioned as the people best placed to carry that information somewhere it wouldn't otherwise reach.


    That includes across generations, not just within them. Rather than treating climate education as something to segregate by age bracket, the curriculum leans on art as a shared language, one seniors can use to open conversations about climate with people decades younger than themselves, conversations that might not start the same way otherwise.



    What Comes Next

    A short summary of the curriculum's main outcomes is in development, intended to sit alongside the project's existing podcast series and offer a more condensed, practical look at what this framework has produced so far.

     

    This work is part of the Seniors Climate Action project, co-funded by the European Union under the Erasmus+ programme, developing climate education resources for senior artists across Europe.

    MORE IN:

    Projects

    Explore More Stories

    Discover more inspiring conversations, insights, and perspectives from the art world.

    Whose Experience Counts as Expertise? | ARTIT